I can't remember if anyone gave me any encouraging words to hang in there, but I did get an idea to pitch to them. And they liked it enough to run with it. Here I was informed of how an article had to work. The premise, of course, had to be handled as if it were an actual event. Drop in names and quotes to support the idea. In the article they strongly advised us to have opposing opinions within the articles. To them, that's what make the idea more believable, that we have show that some people aren't buying it. Then their graphic department would go to town to bring it all to life.
With this knowledge, I tackled my first WWN story and "Dan Fiorella, Reporter." It was also the last appearance of "Dan Fiorella, Reporter." Somewhere between this article and my next one, it occurred to me that maybe having a by-line in the WWN would not translate well to my so-called "writing career." There were many who looked down on the National Enquirer and the WWN (their reputation has skidded further downhill since back then). I honestly feared that others wouldn't get the joke about writing for the tabloid so all my future stories were submitted under a nom de plume.
By coincidence, I've been running these WWN posts 22 years to the weeks they had run. I'm going to lose that synchronization here. There was a gap between my last Dear Dottie and my first article, then multiple gaps of time between them. This surprised me as I remembered this all running my stories more frequently. Oh, well.
More to come...